Garmin Connect vs. Nike+

After un-boxing my new Garmin last night, I exitedly pulled out each element of the package and was sure to connect it to a power source for its required 3 hours of initial charging. I left it overnight, so first thing when I woke up, I hopped out of bed to start playing around and learning all I need to know for enhanced running geekiness.

Since I slept in (til 8 AM) and then dilly-dallied around most of the morning, I didn’t get out for my ‘test run’ until early afternoon – and since I did my long run Saturday, I decided that I’d run just a mile to test out my new gear. I was going to just head out with the Garmin (no cellphone, etc) but hubs suggested I take both out (my iPhone has the Nike+ application, which I depended on a lot when I first started running) to see if the data matched.  Challenge accepted!

I carried the iPhone in my iFitness belt, and therefore there is a several second delay for the data since I had to switch it on, then stow the device before starting/ ending the run.

Post run data 🙂

When I returned home, I loaded up the info and this is what I found:

Screenshot of Garmin Dashboard

I was already somewhat familiar with the Garmin Connect software, as my previous watch was the Garmin FR60, a sans-GPS running watch – so this addition of seeing my course mapped out was pretty cool – not to mention the Elevation data!

Charts of Time/Elevation

As you can see, I chose a nice downhill slope, hit a turnaround (conveniently it was where the sidewalk literally ended) and proceeded back up until I saw 1 mile on the screen.

And now, the Nike+ data, from the iPhone…

Nike+ run data

The time matched up pretty close, given the imperfection of the experiment…

Map data

The map of course, checked out as well.

I know that for a more accurate test-out, it’d probably be more beneficial to do more than a mile, but I have to say that in my totally un-scientific mission today, I was pretty impressed by the accuracy of both instruments. This might beg the question – why would you then get a $100+ watch when you can get similar results from a $2 application? Well, good question – and depending on your individual situation, this could be a useful discussion to have with yourself.

Nike + pros

  • Inexpensive
  • Accurate
  • Cool integration with social media (post to Facebook, Nike community, etc.)
  • You can play your iTunes playlists through the application

Nike+ cons

  • Tends to use lots of battery life
  • You have to carry an extra accessory (I used to wear an armband with it)
  • The website is slow!!

Anyway, it definitely is nice to have options when it comes to tracking running workouts. I am excited to see how this new piece of technology enhances my training.

Do you think technology helps/hinders your running?

 

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Garmin Connect vs. Nike+

  1. I went from Nike+iPod (not the GPS version) to a Garmin and haven’t looked back. Well, I still use Nike+ for treadmill runs. The Garmin is hands down better. It is customizable to show you what you want to see (on the watch and in Garmin Connect). But then again, I am a self-professed data diva. Give me lots of data and I am a happy camper.

    • I have used the Nike+ (non GPS, the one on the iPod nano) as well and since I haven’t officially calibrated it, it seems way off most of the time, but it is still fun to run the program just to get more data…I am such a ‘data diva’ too 😀

    • Also, I have the foot pod from my past Garmin (FR60) so I used the Garmin sans GPS today and it was awesome!!!!

  2. I also went from using Nike + to a Garmin and have to say that I prefer my watch as the primary data source.Nike+ is limited in the amount of data it provides like no elevation, split info, or heart rate. I especially like knowing my splits during a race to see where I started to slip. Garmin has its cons too like how it doesn’t have the talk to you during the run. Maybe they’ll include this feature in the future?? I can dream right? heck while I’m at it, how about a holographic running partner beamed out of the watch to keep you on pace??

  3. I run with a garmin,but rarely use it for more than distance.Cant remember the last time I downloaded my workouts. Guess that shows how much “fun running” ive been doing vs real training lately 😉

  4. Garmin’s technology is, so far, just superb. The satellite receiver gets a signal from satellites every 4 seconds, so that means it will rarely cut corners. Most apps I’ve seen and other GPS watches do not ping that often, and they cut corners or lose their satellite signal much quicker when blocked.

  5. Pingback: Running the Blue Ridge. « Shiawase Life

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s